This is just another leawyr capitalizing on the infamy of this trial to make a ton of money. He doesn't even try to convince of O.J.'s innocence because that would be impossible.Regarding the two pieces of evidence the other reviewer mentioned proving' O.J.'s innocence, neither is pertinent. Neither was featured prominently by the defense, nor mentioned by the jurors as a reason for acquittal. The defense itself put the time of the murders at 10:45, rendering the red blood evidence' as unimportant since their OWN time-line would have been made a lie of. The blood under the fingernails was degraded blood which can not be typed-but the fingers were found in a pool of her own blood making it extraordinarily likely that it was her own blood.Consider the following: Simpson had a fresh cut on his finger and his blood was found in his home, in the Bronco and at Nicole's residence. If he hadn't had a cut big enough to bleed there would have been no case. A pretty extraordinary coincidence. Simpson had been given gloves, like the ones found, by Nicole and had been photographed wearing them. He said he had never owned those ugly as# shoes (Bruno Magli) but then a photo was found with him wearing those exact shoes. He had bought a knife the size of the one used, which was never found. The limo driver never saw a white Bronco before 11:00 despite going to both entrances. He rang the door bell many times but received no answer until almost 11:00. Kato heard a VERY loud bump behind his room at the very time Simpson was alleged to have been there, and at the exact place where the glove was found. MANY police officers were alleged to have been in on the plot', but neither the defense nor Simpson ever pushed for an investigation, nor did they put any effort into finding the real' killer. Furman, the supposed leader' of the plot, only arrived long after many other police officers, none of which saw a second glove at the crime scene.This is only the tip of the iceberg but should be enough to convince any honest person. One of the real low points in U.S. legal history.